You
Must Have Something
Worth
Dying For
Thomas
Martin
Thomas Martin teaches in the Department of Philosophy at the
University of Nebraska at Kearney. You may contact Thomas Martin at: martint@unk.edu.
I
am writing to support all those who wish to protest our involvement in
Iraq. I support you! You are the reason I wear this uniform. I have
willingly placed myself in harm’s way so that you can have the right to
protest what I am doing. You are the reason why I fight. I have sworn to
defend our rights and am willing to pay the ultimate price for it, my
life. What are you willing to pay? I do this for you.
These words belong to SPC Jason von Hoff and were in the “letter
box” in the Kearney Hub, April 19, the Saturday before Easter.
SPC von Hoff asked a question every protester of America’s war with
Saddam Hussein ought to ask himself as should every person who enjoys the
freedoms of this nation.
In answering SPC von Hoff’s question “What are you willing to
pay?” it is well to remember that he is not the first American to ask
this question of his fellow Americans. Martin Luther King’s statement,
“Unless you have something worth dying for, you have nothing worth
living for,” is asking us to reflect upon a similar notion.
King’s point is worth contemplating. Given all are going to die,
it is important to ask ourselves, “Since we are not meant to live
forever on this earth, what are we willing to die for?”
Ironically, von Hoff sees that the rights worth defending, in fact,
worth dying for, include the right to protest the very war in which he is
fighting.
King and von Hoff both see that while a person may die for his
country it is not the case that a person ought to live for his country.
Given that we are going to die, the question, “What ought we to
die for?” is essential to having a meaningful life. There are various
ways to answer the question: I live for myself? I live for my family? I
live for my occupation? I live for my country? I live for my neighbor?
If I were to live for myself, then I would die for myself. If this
is the kind of person I am, then you ought not to trust me because I am
only interested in myself.
If I will live for my family, then I would die for my family. The
members of my family might well trust me, but no one beyond my family
ought to because I place my family before all others.
The outcome of living for my occupation depends upon the reason for
performing the duties of the occupation. For example, a nurse who lives to
help patients maintain health and deal with their sufferings unto death
has a different motive than a nurse who is performing the duties of
nursing simply for money. A CEO of an airline who has his employees’
best interests in mind is different than a CEO who has his own best
interests in mind at the expense of his employees, as the recent case of
American Airlines shows.
If I live for my country, then I would die for my country. But
would the people of other countries trust me, knowing that I would
sacrifice my life for my country without questioning whether what my
country asked of me were right or wrong? This is SPC von Hoff’s point:
while respecting the protesters’ right to protest, he is fighting in the
war they protest. Fear the day when any American is not allowed to openly
speak his mind to protest what the government is doing.
If I would live for my neighbor, then I would die for my neighbor.
Here it is important to remember, a neighbor is any person in need of
one’s help or kindness. Need more be said?
In all of this, it is important to remember that living cannot be
separated from dying, and that when we give our lives to others we must
die to ourselves. SPC von Hoff knows this. Martin Luther King knew this.
But this is because both are echoing a truth that is not of this world,
“Whosoever shall seek his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose
his life shall preserve it.”
Paradoxically, it is by losing our lives that we preserve what is
sacred in our families, our occupations, our nation, our neighbors, and
ourselves. Ω
|