|
Libertarian’s Corner:
A Lesson from a Fairy Tale
Joseph S. Fulda
Joseph Fulda is a
freelance writer living in New York City. He is the author of Eight Steps Towards Libertarianism. The fairy tale or
fable is a literary device by which adults -- who have learned many of
life’s lessons the hard way -- impart wisdom to the young. It is at once an
exciting and captivating story and a lesson in moral imagination. It succeeds
because it is simple and direct. Across most cultures, there is a recurring fairy
tale: The Fairy Tale of The Three Wishes. In the fable, the poor chap who is at
once hero and fool of the story is given three wishes. The first wish is
inevitably spent on something foolish and trivial, but the wish is fulfilled
powerfully and right away, thereby emboldening the wisher. The next wish is a
much more serious wish, one that will thoroughly change the life of the wisher,
all at once. Inevitably, it brings disaster and ruination upon the wisher,
whose third wish, inevitably, is humbler -- to be rescued from the disasters of
his earlier wishes with everything in his world restored to normalcy. This
wish, also, is granted, and the hero comes away a much sadder but much wiser
man. What is the moral of
this story? It is not quite that we do not know our own minds and what we
really want, because of course in some important senses we do. I think the
teaching of the story is that we are not wise enough to get what we want all at
once by merely wishing for it, for we cannot foresee the multitude of
consequences that will undoubtedly ensue, many of which we would not want.
Unlike when objects of our desire are earned slowly, there is no feedback about
the wisdom and appropriateness of the goal, there is no turning back or perhaps
merely turning aside -- the wish is carried out by the genie exactly as it is
expressed in words. There is thus no opportunity for reevaluation,
reexamination, and ultimately reconsideration as there is when one embarks on a
long path to a goal. Furthermore, when working towards a goal, a person commits
his whole self to the goal in that he must take action after action after
action to achieve his goal, and he must do so over a prolonged waiting period.
When wishing, however, he does not have to put thought, care, or repeated and
sustained effort into attaining his goal. Each action a person has to put
towards a goal takes effort and each such action is therefore a reason to
abandon the goal, if it is not worth -- if it is no longer worth -- the effort.
The actions that people must take to achieve their dreams dampen their
enthusiasm for them. Engineers call such dampening a “negative feedback
loop” and it is the hallmark of a stable system that it centers around
such a loop. “Positive feedback loops” quickly go out of control
and rock the system’s limits. So what, then, is it
fair to conclude about knowing one’s own mind: At every step of the way
towards a goal, a person knows whether the next step is worth it in light of
that small step’s consequences -- small enough to be seen and felt -- and
the effort required. Whether the step after that will also be worth it is
something he will not, finally, decide till it is ripe for decision. The saving
grace is that even if a subsequent step is no longer worth the effort often
that does not mean the prior steps were in vain: Instead of turning back, the
person may turn aside, and choose a path parallel rather than perpendicular to
the original path. The astute reader will
already have divined the point we wish to make. The legislator is a wisher.
Laws are wishes. And legislatures have not learned the lesson of the child’s
simple but profound tale. Consider. Laws, like wishes, are effected at any
speed -- even all at once; with the exception of Prohibition and a few other
less notable cases, they are rarely reconsidered. The legislatures of this land
do not take incremental steps towards whatever end they desire and then
reevaluate both ends and means, always in light of the continued worthiness of
the goal and the additional effort required. Laws are not like life’s
goals. Many of them are foolish and trivial like the first wish in the fairy
tale. Many of them are much more serious and wreak havoc on everyone and
everything in sight in countless unthought of ways. But the legislators do not
learn, like the sadder but wiser fool who through his learning becomes the hero
of the tale, to simply undo their wishes expressed as legal fiats. Rather,
seeing the untoward consequences of their wishes they remain, sometimes
willfully, sometimes not, ignorant of the causes of the calamities their wishes
have brought about. And they proceed to “repair” the damage with
another, yet another, and yet still another wish, and the calamities multiply
as the wishes are effected by the genies of government enforcers. * “A lot of people mean
well, but their meanness is greater than their wellness.” --Robert Hunter
We
would like to thank the following people for their generous contributions in
support of this journal (from 9/13/2004 to 11/18/2004): Ariel, H.G. Bailey,
Dirk A. Ballendorf, Nancy M. Bannick, Harry S. Barrows, Arnold Beichman, Carol
& Bud Belz, Charles Benscheidt, Aletha W. Berry, Peter Block, William G.
Buckner, Thomas M. Burt, Alva D. Butler, Terry Cahill, N. J. Christianson, Irma
I. Clark, John Alden Clark, Samuel J. Criscio, Daniel G. Crozier, John
D’Aloia, Lynn Davidson, Jim Dea, Jeanne L. Dipaola, Lester Farmer, Reuben
M. Freitas, C. Jerome C. Fritz, Kelly A. Grant, Matthew B. Grocott, Alene D.
Haines, Daniel J. Haley, Violet H. Hall, Anthony Harrigan, Bernhard Heersink,
Norman G. P. Helgeson, Richard Herreid, Jaren E. Hiller, Arthur H. Ivey, O. Guy
Johnson, Ken E. Kampfe, Martin Kellogg, Herbert London, Gregor MacDonald, John
L. Mrocchi, W. C. Metcalf, King Odell, Ruth Orland, Daniel D. Payne, James R.
Peterson, Mark & Beth Richter, Patrick L. Risch, Frances Rutherford, Michael
J. Ryan, W. E. Saunders, Irene Schultz, William Schummrick, Weldon O. &
Roxana B. Shepherd, G. R. Slade, Paul Sopko, John D. Sours, Carl G. Stevenson,
Norman Stewart, Michael S. Swisher, Paul B. Thompson, Doug Tice, Daniel J.
Torrance, Miller Upton, Eugene & Diane Watson, Robert C. Whitten, Herbert
A. Widell, Piers Woodriff, Miriam K. Yachnin. |
||
[ Who We Are | Authors | Archive | Subscription | Search | Contact Us ] © Copyright St.Croix Review 2002 |